It must be possible to penalize predatory pricing whenever there is a risk that competitors will be eliminated. It would not be appropriate to require in addition, in order to categorize its pricing as predatory, proof that the undertaking concerned had a realistic chance of recouping its losses. When determining whether an undertaking has practised predatory pricing for the purposes of applying Article 86 of the Treaty, a distinction must be drawn between prices below average variable costs, which must always be considered abusive, and prices below average total costs but above average variable costs, which are only to be considered abusive if an intention to eliminate can be shown. Consequently, even where tied sales of two products are in accordance with commercial usage or there is a natural link between the two products in question, such sales may still constitute abuse within the meaning of Article 86 unless they are objectively justified.Ĥ. The list of abusive practices set out in the second paragraph of Article 86 of the Treaty is not exhaustive. Conduct by such an undertaking on those distinct markets which is alleged to be abusive may therefore be covered by Article 86 of the Treaty without any need to show that it is dominant on them.ģ. In the case of distinct, but associated, markets, application of Article 86 to conduct found on the associated, non-dominated, market and having effects on that associated market can only be justified by special circumstances.Īn undertaking which enjoys a quasi-monopoly on certain markets and a leading position on distinct, though closely associated, markets is placed in a situation comparable to that of holding a dominant position on those markets as a whole. Application of Article 86 presupposes a link between the dominant position and the alleged abusive conduct, which is normally not present where conduct on a market distinct from the dominated market produces effects on that distinct market. When defining the relevant market for the purpose of applying Article 86 of the Treaty, the competitive conditions and the structure of supply and demand on the market are relevant criteria for determining whether certain products are interchangeable with others.Ģ. Competition ° Dominant position ° Abuse ° Pricing below cost in order to eliminate a competitorġ. Competition ° Dominant position ° Abuse ° System of tied salesĤ. Competition ° Dominant position ° Conduct on a neighbouring market to the dominated market ° Application of Article 86 even in the absence of a dominant position on the neighbouring market ° Conditionsģ. Competition ° Dominant position ° Relevant market ° Delimitation ° CriteriaĢ. Summary Parties Grounds Decision on costs Operative part Keywordsġ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |